Category: Legal

Fraudsters on the Road

Fraudsters on the Road

‘Crash For Cash’ (CFC) scams are officially defined by the Insurance Fraud Bureau (IFB) as a scam that aims to “stage or deliberately cause a road traffic collision solely for the purpose of financial gain. Crash For Cash scams are a very serious and widespread issue in the UK. It’s estimated the scams cost motorists around £340 million a year, and over the years these CFC scams have become more and more sophisticated.  It’s bad enough having to be alert to email and internet scams all the time without having to dodge criminals on the roads too but that is the world we now live in.

There are numerous criminal gangs staging road traffic accidents and the following (potentially very dangerous) methods are just a few examples of the ways in which the average driver can be swindled:

Most commonly happens when there’s a lot of traffic. The other driver waves for you to merge into their lane. As you join it, the car speeds up and collides with your vehicle. The other driver will then deny offering you the right of way and will assert that you were at fault for ‘cutting them up’.

Swooping and squatting
This scam requires two fraudsters. As you’re driving along, a car will pull out on the driver in front, forcing them to brake suddenly. Even if you’re moving at a slow speed there’s still a high risk of a collision. The car that pulled out in front will be the ‘swoop’ and they will leave the scene quickly. The car in front of you will be the ‘squat’ and is likely to be filled with passengers that all claim injury if you have the misfortune to run into the back of them.  You can practically see the pound signs in their eyes!

Also called ‘flash for cash’. When trying to pull out of a junction, a driver will ‘flash’ their lights indicating that he/she is letting you out. As you pull out, the driver will accelerate and crash into you. As you’re pulling into a lane of oncoming traffic, you’re at fault.  How you deal with the aftermath of such a collision is critical to a good outcome for you and your insurance company.

Slamming on
The fraudster will disconnect their brake lights (a brazen act of illegality) and then slam them on for no apparent reason. You won’t realise until it’s too late and a collision has occurred.  Of course, he or she will blame you for not maintaining an adequate distance but brake lights are fitted for a very good reason, to warn other motorists, and you would be a victim in such circumstances.

To protect yourself from these types of frauds, remember to always keep a safe braking distance from the vehicle in front of you and drive responsibly. If you’re unsure of another driver’s signalling to you be very cautious; protect yourself always.

If you do get involved in a suspicious road traffic accident take your time and make sure you have as many details as possible of the driver and passengers, and any witnesses at the scene.  If possible, take multiple pictures of the damage to both vehicles, the general layout of the road, and some of the driver and any passengers might not be a bad thing either.  Not letting anyone drive off until you have all the details might make them think twice about pursuing a dodgy claim anyway.  If you are suspicious that you’re being set up as the target of a fraudster, do not for a second hesitate to contact the police to attend the scene.

If you believe you’ve become victim of “crash for cash” fraudsters contact Michael McGhie today on 01202 877400 or via his email!

Drink Driving and the Festive Season

It’s December again.  The season of good cheer for most and the opportunity to get together with friends and family and have a good time.

Sadly, it’s also the time of year when the Government runs a fresh and usually extremely brutal new anti-drink drive TV campaign and it tends to be a time of year when people get caught for drink driving – with many bad consequences for themselves, and possibly for others.

However, it’s not all bad news.  An examination of the statistics for the most recent year available [2016] shows us that there are fewer drink drivers than ten years ago.

In 2016, 3,424 people failed a breathalyser test following an accident, a 42% decrease from 5,873 in 2006. The decrease in failed test results correlates with fewer drink-driving related accidents over the years.

Drink-driving accidents have been recorded from 1979 and the number of alcohol-related accidents has also dropped by 71%.

However, drink-drivers are more prevalent on some roads than others.  The majority of drink-driving offenders have been caught on rural roads, with 35% testing over the limit.  Newnham & Jordan cover road traffic clients charged with drink driving (as well as speeding and other offences such as careless driving) both in urban and rural areas, particularly concentrating on Dorset and Hampshire, but extending into Wiltshire and Somerset.  It’s a sad fact that rural roads are generally more dangerous than urban roads and motorways which are normally better lit, better surfaced, wider and (at this chilly time of the year) much better gritted.

Another key statistic is the rise in the number of older drivers finding themselves convicted of drink driving.  From a total of 1,295 over 65s convicted of drink driving in 2005 this jumped to 1,435 in 2015.  An AA spokesperson opined that older drivers may have got away with it in the past and believe they can still drive while “half cut”.

At the end of the day there is no safe level of alcohol in one’s system and all drivers take a significant risk if they choose to drive after having a drink.

Have you been involved in a road traffic accident? Call Michael McGhie on 01202 877 400 for a practical, sensible solution!

Drink Driving and the Festive Season
Coping With a Broken Relationship on Christmas

Coping With a Broken Relationship on Christmas

One of the hardest things for families to cope with is Christmas. It is an emotive time of the year particularly for separated families with young children. Each parent will want to have their children with them on Christmas Day and, as we all know, sometimes that is simply impossible. This can be due to something as simple as logistics of travel depending on the distance, or in the alternative one parents view of “we have always had Christmas with my parents and so the children should be with me”.

When it comes to Christmas and separated families sadly the whole issue of who should have what can become contentious and at this time of year it is not uncommon to see the Court’s lists full of applications for contact for children. Parents need to consider that contact is for the benefit of the child, rather than the parent. It is the child’s right to have a full and good relationship with both parents and the only way that this can happen is if Mum and Dad can communicate constructively and be prepared to compromise. The Court’s position on Christmas and New Year is that it should alternate between the parents and that on the year that one parent has the New Year then they celebrate their Christmas at that point. If you ask a child who they want to spend Christmas with, probably in the first instant they would say with you both. Pragmatically however, as long as they get to see you they don’t really mind and hey they get to celebrate Christmas twice – which to any child is pretty fantastic. What they won’t thank you for is arguing and causing upset (which then makes them potentially have to choose sides).

Conflict between parents is known to significantly impact on children’s abilities to form relationships in the future and this is not what any parent should want for their child. If you are struggling with this then there are many ways forward. The first and most pragmatic is to try to sit down and talk reasonably, being aware that compromise is necessary for your children’s welfare. If you don’t think that would work, then mediation (which is where you and your former partner/spouse can sit down with a trained mediator who will help you to compromise things). The final alternative is to seek help from lawyers and the Court, being very much aware that a Court ultimately may make an order that neither of you will be happy with.

If you need further help and advice then please don’t hesitate to contact our Family Team on 01202 877400 or – because your family matters to us and we are here to help.

What Does an Executor Do?

Many aren’t aware of the obligations that come with being an Executor of someone’s Will. Executors have a number of duties, depending on the complexity of the deceased person’s financial and family circumstances.

An Executor’s first task would be to find the deceased person’s property and manage it until it’s shared amongst the beneficiaries. This may involve deciding whether to sell land or securities owned by the deceased person. Making enquiries with both asset and liability holders and obtaining valuations for property, land, and personal chattels is the Executor’s requirement. After the enquiries have been made it will be clear to the Executor whether or not a Grant of Probate would be needed for dealing with the administration of the estate

A Grant of Probate is a document which authorises the executor to deal with the estate of the deceased. It enables them to deal with certain aspects of administering the estate like closing bank accounts and selling or transferring property. A Grant of Probate is not required to deal with the handling of all estates, however it is often the case that one would be required.

Once the assets and liabilities of the estate have been determined, the Executors will be required to submit an Inheritance Tax return which will confirm whether there is any Inheritance Tax due from the estate. The Executors will need to make sure that any reliefs have been applied and that the right sum of Inheritance Tax is paid. The Executors will also need to consider any lifetime gifts which the deceased made in the 7 years prior to their death as well as any trusts which they may have benefited from.

After completing the Inheritance Tax return the Executor will need to sign and swear an Oath. The Oath sets out information of the deceased and how the Executor has the right to deal with the administration of the estate. The Oath is submitted to the Probate Registry once it has been both signed and sworn. The Grant of Probate is normally issued in two weeks.

After receiving the Grant of Probate you would be able to progress with collecting in the assets of the estate. You will be able to arrange the closure of bank accounts and the sale and transfer of the property.

After all of the assets have been collected in and all of the liabilities have been paid, the Executors will then be able to distribute the estate according to the Will, or if there was no Will and the deceased died “intestate” then the estate will need to be distributed in accordance with the Rules of Intestacy.  A set of Estate Accounts should be produced and –  if requested – should be made available to beneficiaries and creditors of the estate.

The distribution of the estate to the beneficiaries is the Executor’s final task regarding its administration. An Executor is not required to administer an estate before the expiration of one year from the date of death (the “Executor’s Year”). However, if all of the assets have been collected in and all liabilities settled then there is no reason to delay paying the beneficiaries.

If you have been appointed as an Executor and you require any assistance in dealing with the administration of an estate please contact Angie Newnham on 1301202 877 400!

What Does an Executor Do?
The Stamp Duty Land Tax Change – A Huge Relief for First-Time Buyers

The Stamp Duty Land Tax Change – A Huge Relief for First-Time Buyers

It was announced yesterday that Stamp Duty Land Tax will be scrapped immediately for first-time buyers of homes up to £300,000. The move was made in an attempt to reduce the ever growing gap between homeowners and first-time buyers and is set to benefit 95% of first time buyers. The move will likely abolish Stamp Duty for about 80 % of them. It’s predicted that thanks to this change 300,000 homes would be built by the middle of the next decade and that more than one million young people would take advantage of this change over the next five years.

The Associative Discrimination Trap


Even though most employers are well-aware of the dangers of discrimination there are slight differences that catch many experienced bosses unprepared.

Employees are able to claim damages if you discriminate against them indirectly. One of the forms of indirect discrimination is associative discrimination. For example, an employee can successfully claim discrimination by association if he/she was dismissed after saying he/she needs to spend more time caring for his/her disabled daughter.

Discrimination can be an extremely worrying accusation for any employer as there is no cap on the compensation payment. There is also no qualifying period for it, so an employee need not have worked a minimum length of time before being able to claim.

These two factors have made it very easy for aggrieved employees to file a discrimination claim without having to accrue the necessary two years’ service required for an unfair dismissal claim. And associative discrimination has become an easy way for them to claim damages. Employees who are unable to claim direct discrimination against their bosses may try to make a claim of discrimination by proxy.

Associative discrimination is based on the same protected characteristics as cases of direct discrimination: age; disability; gender reassignment; marriage and civil partnership; pregnancy and maternity; race; religion and belief; sex; sexual orientation.

One does not need to be an employee in order to make a claim – those who are applying for a job can take legal action if they believe a prospective future employer has discriminated against them.

That also applies with regards to associative discrimination.

If you believe you have fallen a victim to the Associative Discrimination trap, please contact Fiona Pawsey on 01202877400 (Ferndown) or 01305 470051 (Weymouth) or via email on for a free initial appointment.

The comments above are the writer’s opinion based upon the information so far available it does not constitute legal advice.

The Associative Discrimination Trap